FORMAL ARTIFACT • BOARD-LEVEL PUBLIC • SAMPLE

Sample report excerpt: Model Integrity Report

This document shows an illustrative structure of an audit-grade artifact. Content is demonstrative and does not constitute legal advice.

DOC-ID
LEDESCO-MIR-0001
STATUS
SAMPLE / NON-BINDING
VERSION
v1.0
DATE
2026-01-28

UX interpretation: this is a “document”. Each artifact has metadata, scope, owners, and consequences.

Executive Summary

Consistency verification indicates zones where the outcome is sensitive to high-leverage parameters and implicit assumptions. Decision use should be restricted to explicit validity boundaries.

  • Outcome: The model is consistent within a limited data corridor.
  • Primary risk (CRITICAL): missing explicit boundary conditions.
  • Recommendation: introduce decision gates and an audit trail.

Decision posture: a decision is defensible only when validity boundaries are explicit and enforceable.

Scope & assumptions

This excerpt demonstrates typical integrity report components: inputs, assumptions, constraints, and ownership.

Element Description Notes
Inputs Data sources, frequency, input validation Consistency and completeness checks required
Assumptions Explicit and implicit assumptions; high-leverage parameters Each assumption has an owner and rationale
Constraints Non-valid zones, drift risk, missing data Out-of-scope output = no decision use

Validity boundaries

Validity boundaries define when the model output may be used for decisions and when escalation is required.

  • Boundaries are defined as boundary conditions (data corridor).
  • Boundary violations generate audit trail entries.
  • Boundaries map to risks and control gates.

Risk register

Sample excerpt of a risk register. A full version includes: status, owner, due date, control gate, and evidence.

Level Risk Owner Gate
CRITICAL Missing explicit boundary conditions / no defined non-valid zone. Compliance + Model Owner Gate-01: Validity Boundaries Signed-off
MAJOR High sensitivity to a high-leverage parameter without assigned ownership. Model Owner Gate-02: Assumption Ownership
MODERATE Input data drift risk without monitoring controls. Data Steward Gate-03: Drift Monitoring

Decision Audit Trail

The audit trail is a formal record: inputs → logic → decision → accountability, built for internal/external review.

  • Inputs: sources + validation + snapshot timestamp.
  • Logic: rules / model / exceptions / fallback.
  • Decision: who decided, on what basis, with what limitations.
  • Accountability: owner + approval + gate evidence.

Institutional requirement: if the audit trail cannot be articulated, output should not drive decisions.

Appendix: definitions & controls

  • Validity Boundary: boundary condition for permissible decision use.
  • Decision Gate: control checkpoint enforcing auditability.
  • Owner: accountable person for an assumption/parameter/control.

This is a structural example. Real reports are adapted to the selected audit area and agreed document workflow.